data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4d71b/4d71bd0c57467dfc2e4b9f28fa4b28cb310a8a97" alt=""
Nature is just. Accordingly, you can’t slaughter your child without slaughtering your self, too.Photo by: Fibonacci Blue
Not so me. I have been much-benefitted by these awful atrocities, to the extent that I think I am by now completely unassailable on the topic. Here are three ways to apprehend my efforts:
1. In (brutal) fiction: Finding visibility, absolution and closure at the choo-choo train at the mall on New Year’s Eve..
2. In (many) essays: My arguments against intrauterine infanticide.
3. In (copious) video, in the form of these four video homilies from The Church of Splendor:
Terminating #Abortion: The #PlannedParenthood atrocities show that we are all ghouls now.
How to win everything – by driving everyone else crazy.
The Captain’s Commitment: Honoring our enduring obligations.
The Victims of the Sanction: @YaronBrook and the #AynRand Institute must respond on #abortion.
I think this debate is entirely mine: There is no way to reconcile a pro-liberty philosophy with hostility to marriage and family, with sexual libertinism or with abortion. Freedom emerges from strong families – and only from strong families. Any argument that undermines self-responsible fatherhood necessarily impedes and eventually eviscerates all human liberty, where arguing in behalf of Hoplite fatherhood exalts and buttresses the freedom of every individual human being.